Which do you prefer, Realistic or Artistic?
THE OLD NICKELS INN – SEARSPORT, MAINE
Type 4: Artistic Editing (Use Camera Raw Adjustment Brushes)
A Type 4 photographer has an artistic eye and uses adjustment brushes to paint with color and light to enhance his image and transform it into a photo painting. In this case, I opened the original jpeg in Adobe Bridge, then hit Cmd R to open it in Camera Raw. First I made some quick, basic edits to add saturation, clarity, exposure and blacks, but I kept it quite dark. Then I used adjustment brushes (amazing new Camera Raw tool in CS4 and above) to paint some light and saturation on the sky and dandelions. The really amazing part is you don’t need raw images to enjoy Camera Raw editing. If you have Adobe Photoshop and Bridge CS4 and above you can do non-destructive editing on jpegs and it will store the original image and all edits inside the jpeg file. No more saving multiple files, and no more annoying, huge camera raw files!
Type 3: Realistic Editing (Add Adjustment Layers)
The Type 3 photographer has some advanced image editing skills. The colors are enhanced and the exposure is corrected. The sky and house both have realistic lighting details. These areas must be edited in different ways to restore a realistic image, because the camera does not often capture the correct exposure for all parts of an image. Instead it meters where it is pointed and the rest of them image may be under or overexposed. In this example, I could have easily used adjustment brushes in Camera Raw (though it does take a bit more practice), but this time, I added three adjustment layers to increase the saturation, change exposure levels, and correct the color balance. I masked out part of the effect on the house and foreground, because the sky needed more of the color restored.
Type 2: Beginner Editing (Add Brightness, Levels, Saturation)
A Type 2 photographer wants to improve his image, but as a beginner he adds brightness to a shot like this in Photoshop and it blows out the sky. He should take his editing to the next level and learn to use Photoshop adjustment layers, (or adjustment brushes in Camera Raw) to edit selective portions of an image, each in a different way. If realism is the goal, then a photographer wants the subject and the sky to both look the same as his eyes saw the scene. If artistry is the desired outcome, then a photographer can become an artist and paint with light and color, just as a painter who enhances a scene. Which do you prefer, Realistic or Artistic?
Type 1: No Editing – Toss this image out? No way!
Even with a nice digital SLR, many photographers capture this type of flat, dark image when the lighting is not ideal. Without image editing skills, they may toss out a shot like this. However, with Photoshop adjustment layers and/or Camera Raw, an image like this can become quite a beauty. Why not be both: A great photographer and skilled image editor? Sometimes it is not possible to retake a shot like this. We were traveling on the Maine coast after my daughter’s graduation in Boston, and we found this beautiful, old abandoned mansion, called the Nickels Inn. I may not get back to the Maine coast again for years, so I wanted to resurrect this photo, and Photoshop and Camera Raw allowed me to do just that. Of course, I love the thrill of getting a perfect shot, right out of the camera, but lighting and timing conditions are not often ideal. But let’s be real. The majority of our photos, need a little help to look either realistic or artistic. So why not “paint your photo” and create a masterpiece?
I would label myself as a type 3 photographer. I have the basic skills down, and I’ve learned to make some advanced adjustments. I don’t have any experience in camera RAW, but as I practice with that, I hope to move up to a type 4 photographer.
I would say i’m a type2 going on type3. It feels nice to be moving up. Each week my skills are improving. Being able to learn about the different capabilities that can be done to improve a photograph are exciting and I look forward at the end of the semester to see where I’ve been and where I ended up.
I would say that I’m transitioning into a type 3 editor. I’m becoming more comfortable with using layers and doing nondestructive editing which is awesome because I feel like I’m able to do so much more with the image. I’ll have to see how comfortable I become with using Camera Raw. I still have yet to try it so this will be a new experience for me!
I would say I am a style 2. I would like to make my way to style 3 and 4 but I have a lot of work to do …
As far as my editing goes I am probably at a level 2 moving into a mix of level 3 and 4. I like realistic photos, but I really enjoy making a photo look its possible best with edits, even if it loses some realistic qualities. In just the past few weeks I feel that my skills have improve 10X over what they were when I entered the class. It’s always fun to go home and use the new easy tips I learned to make my photos look great with a lot less effort and time.
I would like to think I am a 3 wanting to dabble in a 4. I am a naturalist of sorts. I try to capture the beauty that is already there and see no need to enhance it. I do think though that that is not everybody’s purpose being a 4 photographer. I want to experiment with that kind of editing, but I do not know how without being gaudy or cheap. Any tips? Oh, and before starting the digital imaging class I would say I was a 1 photographer that hoped to accidentally get good shots that do not need editing.
I prefer to be number 3 but I can do number 4, as well. I like to keep things looking as close to as they were in person without going overboard.
Uhm… I think I’m about a 2.75 or so. I’m still learning a lot and I’m not the sort to make photos look artsy. To me they’re still photos and need to look like…well, photos.
I’m most like type 3. I agree with Alex in many respects. I definitely lean more toward natural photography, with slight enhancements to preserve the realism. I do enjoy others’ artistic edits, but have always found myself to be more heavily naturalistic both in my shooting and editing techniques in my photo work. But I don’t think camera RAW has to be meant only for surrealism, I think it is a very valuable tool for both surreal and realistic photographic art.
I would say I am a mix between a type 2 and 3. When I am not being lazy and I really get into editing my photos, I love to go into type 3 editing. But there are types where I feel short on time and just want to get it done and go to a type 2. But I would love to be a type 4 and be jumping from type 3 and 4.
I would say that I am a type 2 transitioning into type 3. But I would also say that my goal is to be a type 4 by the time this class is finished. I have recently begun to use selective editing throughout my edits of photos, but I feel that I still have a lot to learn.
I would say that I am between a type 2 and a type 3. I understand adjustment layers, but I am still trying to figure it out. I would really like to be able to get to be a type 3 because I think that you can do really amazing things with artistic edits.
I would have to say that I am a type 2 photographer and learning type 3. I am trying to eventually become a type 4 because I love the way that these images look and feel and they are perfect for professional work. I do graphic design and just love to look at images. HDR and type 4 images are my favorite and they are what I want to learn. I am a fan of the more artistic images!
I would have to say that I am in the middle of type 2 and 3. I know some basic edits and skill but still that I no where close to being a type 3 or 4. I desire to be a type 4 because I feel there is a lot of use in type 4 when it comes to real life. I want to be able to take pictures and edit them in away there look profesional.
I am very much a #4 in interest. Probably a #3 in ability. Painting is a love of mine and I am always drawn to photos that are painterly. I enjoy working with Camera Raw – would like to know much more, and so I am enjoying this class immensely.
I would consider myself somewhere in between a 2 and a 3. I use Lightroom to adjust every picture I take and most of the time I just adjust the basic things like clarity, saturation, and brightness levels, but I am starting to learn more intermediate techniques to use in my photos.
I would say I am a type 2 right now almost a type 3. I’m not quite there yet but I think I will be soon
I’m a type 2. I can fix exposure on a whole image, but I don’t really understand how to just make adjustments on part of an image.
I am a Type 2–Beginning editing. Now that I can work basics of Photoshop, I just upgraded from a Type 1! I can add saturation and hues to help advance my pictures. I’m slowly learning how to do layers and edits with them, but I’m not fully comfortable with them yet, but I’m hoping to transition into a Type 3 by the end of the semester,
I am a type 3. I’d like to think that I am capable of any of the types, but in my personal photography I prefer to give my pictures a type 3 look and feel.
I am a type 3 photographer. I was taught that you should never over edit. So I thought that when editing you should only edit so that the image looks the way you see it with your eye. I would love to graduate to a type 4 photographer.
I would label myself as a type 3 photographer. Although I do try to get it as realistic as possible just from the camera…it’s true that many times that isn’t possible so Photoshop is a handy tool! I usually try to do type 3 kinds of editing in RAW
I’m a level 2. beginner editor. I haven’t been able to grasp the adjustment layer concept.
Right now I would have to say that I am type two. I hope that through this class my editing skills will progress and I will become a blend of 3 and 4. I like different things about both of the pictures but would like to combine all of them to make a photo that represents my personal style.
I would have to say that I am a type 2 photographer. I have the basic skills of Photoshop, but I think I am afraid of making mistakes to move on to type 3.
I am at least a type 3. I have some good editing skills and am pretty familiar with Photoshop. I’ve messed around with Camera Raw and know some there. After today’s class, I really didn’t know so much could be done in Camera Raw. As to answer the question I think I would like both, being realistic and artistic. I really enjoy photography and learning new things!